One per fandom Melee

[zvi]

This is my thought for the Melee. I probably will not do it if I can't run it through the AO3, so this depends on how soon the next code push, with the prompt challenges, is available.

1) Authors submit stories they would like to have remixed. They may submit one each in up to five fandoms. (No crossovers!)

2) I number the list of all of the stories in each fandom. Using a random number generator, I select one story from each of the different fandoms. (I will do this sequentially, so that if one of your stories is picked, I remove you from the lists for all the other fandoms.)

3) I post all of the selected stories as prompts. So, there will be one Stargate Atlantis story in the melee, and one Leverage, and one Revolutionary Girl Utena, and one One Piece, and one RaPS, etc. etc. So that people who want to participate in the melee will select the fandom they want to work in, but then, as with participants in the Duello, they don't choose which author or which individual story.

Poll #7196

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 11

View Respondents

Sounds like a

View Answers

good idea
10 (100.0%)

bad idea
0 (0.0%)

I will participate in this version of the Melee. (0 = Not enough DW points in the world; 100 = I will pay you DW points to do it!)

View Answers
Mean: 50.00 Median: 55 Std. Dev 26.08

0		0 (0.0%)
10		2 (20.0%)
20		1 (10.0%)
30		0 (0.0%)
40		0 (0.0%)
50		2 (20.0%)
60		1 (10.0%)
70		2 (20.0%)
80		2 (20.0%)
90		0 (0.0%)
100		0 (0.0%)

Obligatory

View Answers

ticky
9 (100.0%)

Comments

[seekingferret]

That's fair enough. It's your challenge to run the way you want to. If that's the organizing principle though, I doubt I'm likely to want to participate in the melee. One constrained story is enough for me.

It's unclear to me why it was a privilege for those who completed their Duello submissions on time. The dead dog conversation suggested people were unaware that if they didn't do Duello they could participate in the Melee, and it's my impression that making that a privilege made it look like a game reserved for people participating in the Duello, a sort of round two instead of a parallel challenge run to address accesibility concerns.

The reason to stamp a metaphorical wheelchair symbol on something is to advertise that it provides value to people with accessibility needs. Otherwise those people are unlikely to magically guess that you're being accessible to them. I'd suggest it was moot because it was made to appear irrelevant, because if a community closes up shop until next year it doesn't look like an inviting place to keep posting.

If you don't want to make that commitment, I think I'd be willing to do it. Though it'd be easier if you could subscribe to a collection on AO3 already.

[zvi]

I am aware that the previous Melee structure did not perform well. That's why I'm going to either change it or scrap it.

I disagree with you on the best way to incorporate things for accessibility. I think that you should structure things in ways that are accessible and then let everyone know what's available, because some people will just prefer the accessible option. It's like whether restaurants should label the ingredients in dishes versus whether they should label some food vegetarian option. I think you should just list all the ingredients, and be happy if people who sometimes eat meat sometimes choose the meatfree option because it sounds delicious.

[seekingferret]

As someone who keeps kosher, my problem with your restaurant analogy is that for my needs, reading a complicated list of ingredients and individually matching it to a complicated set of requirements is a lot harder than just having someone check once that it meets those requirements. My nut allergic friends can testify that just because the ingredients list says it doesn't have nuts doesn't mean there won't be hidden nuts. There are times when there's no substitute for actually vouching for and properly advertising accessibility.

[zvi]

If people's cognitive and emotional issues clumped into easily recognized groups, I might feel comfortable saying, "This addresses your specific needs, people with cognitive and emotional issues." As it is, I'm going to implement the best practices of which I'm aware, that fall in line with the challenge I want to run, and make the rules as clear as possible to everyone.

When you run your challenge, feel free to do it differently.